Methodology

Visual, audiovisual, and digital part. In this second level, the researchers begin to imagine the city shown in audiovisual productions, some of which are derived from the results of the arithmetic research while others are born without going through the numerical part.

For the results that emerge from the arithmetic part, “perception surveys” are produced that will reflect the “citizen iconography” from the collective emblems that will be built based on the answers received. Thus, we cross a line in the surveys and those common themes that exceed 50% of coincidences will be understood as “identity emblems”. In turn, the answers will be crossed by determining point of view (gender, age, socioeconomic level) and, again, those who obtain 50% of coincidences will be understood as “emblems by dominant point of view” (for example, a sketch of danger perception can be only from the point of view of women or only for the popular class or only for young people… etc.). From the identification of these citizen emblems, the audiovisual teams will create “urban files” by folders.

In addition, each team will create archives of images, videos, sounds, etc. that are not born in the statistics, but are contributions of each group of the imagined city, who in their knowledge and feeling of their city decide that a certain fact or object is a factor of citizen identity and capture them, be it a street, a shop window, a monument, a memory, etc. all of this is understood as “creation of urban archives” that the author of this methodology inspired in the deconstructive and psychoanalytic tradition of archives and social memories.